April 18, 2008

Looking at Mars through the Lens of Leibniz

Filed under: Reviews

On the surface, H.G. Wells’ The War of the Worlds is about a Martian invasion of Earth. Well actually Southern England seems to be the target of our rivals from the war god planet. As to be expected, the Martians wreak havoc over the countryside, using in a very literal sense scorched earth tactics and, in scenes eerily prophetic of the first world war, chemical weapons. Presenting a narrative of the lives of two brothers witnessing the penultimate breath of human civilization, this is apocalyptic prose at its highest apex - at the point at which there appears no hope, only resignation.

As a suspenseful tale of Martian vs. Earthling conflict, the story is satisfying. The action is persistent and the tension builds as the Tripods approach London. However, again this is the story as it appears to the reader on the surface. Further examination forces this reader to conclude that Wells aspires to explore the same lines of metaphysical conjecture as both Gottfried Leibniz and his satiric critic Voltaire. The telling clue is on the very first page of Chapter 13.

Wells mentions the destruction of the city of Lisbon from earthquake, compounded by tsunami, compounded by fire. Perhaps in a comical sleight, the narrator believes the destruction to have occurred a century ago, but as we all know the date of the catastrophe was 1755, nearly 150 years preceding the setting of the novel.

The sudden destruction of Lisbon and the great suffering in its aftermath are important and vital scenes in Voltaire’s great satire Candide, a cutting criticism of the metaphysical optimism put forth by Gottfried Leibniz, the mathematician, philosopher and general polymath in his 1710 treatise Theodicy. It is title character Candide’s and his tutor Pangloss’ visit to Lisbon just after the earthquake (so soon after that their ship is nearly swallowed up by the ensuing tsunami and their traveling commrade the Anabaptist is lost to the rising waters of the bay) that begins sewing the seeds of doubt in Candide’s belief that this world is indeed “the best of all possible worlds.”

According to Leibniz, our reality, our world, is the best off all possible worlds - the very optimal that God, in his omnipotent concern and care for us, could create. Since God is good and omnipotent, and since He chose this world out of all possibilities, this world must be good–in fact, this world is the best. Even suffering and evil has its place in this best of worlds, because if there could possibly be one better, with a little less suffering and not as much evil, then God would have created that. Voltaire thought this idea to be ludicrous, and he sends his naive yet thoughtful protagonist Candide on adventures throughout Europe and the New World to reveal the very weaknesses of Leibniz’s argument. We witness the great suffering and evil that Candide witnesses, and consequently our own belief, if we had any, in the optimism of Leibniz is all but crushed like a monk under a huge stone hurled from the roof of a cathedral in Lisbon in 1755.

The events in Lisbon caused seismic tremors all throughout the intellectual strata of Europe. The earthquake struck in the morning, killing many Catholic celebrants at mass on All Saints Day. Who would blame any citizen of Lisbon for resigning himself to the revelation that this was the end of time? The horrific events of these few days would force many to ask again those ageless questions:

Why does God allow suffering?

If God is all-seeing and all-powerful, why is there evil?

These are the very questions at the root of Theodicy. This is what Leibniz attempted to answer through reason, and it is toward Leibniz’s answer that Voltaire, by way of his fictional ego Candide, thumbed his nose at.

It can be argued that Voltaire, like most deists of his era, believed that God simply did not care about the plight of man - that he had set the clockwork of creation in motion but then had left it at home by his bedside to enjoy some rest and recreation down at the beach. Many came around to adopt similar paradigms of reason and enlightenment. Events like the great earthquake in Lisbon had shaken the very foundation of faith in 18th century Europe, but what does this have to do with Mars?

In War of the Worlds, London is the new Lisbon. Instead of a comprehensive faith in the almighty, there is now faith in industry, in technology, in the projection of power, all things that have made the British Empire king. The sun does not set on the empire. Religious conviction has been subjugated to commerce, the smokestack and the exploitation of colonial possessions. Little do the imperial subjects realize that they are being watched by an intelligence far more advanced than their own, an intelligence that has plans upon their blue-green world.

What once was the best of all possible worlds for a Martian, is no longer suitable at all. Due to entropic decay, it has become a cold world depleted of the necessary resources to keep Martians free of suffering. Naturally the dark, black eyes of the Martian looked upon the warm Earth with jealousy. Plans were put into play.

Who would blame any citizen of the empire, his stiff upper lip quivering in fear, for believing that what he was witnessing with the death throes of human progress, eventually of all humanity? It must have felt something like a quaking in the earth to see the artillery batteries melt under the Martians’ mysteries heat rays. One would wonder what Candide would have thought surveying the ravaged towns and the mass of humanity fleeing, tearing at each other for advantage . . . Oh screw it, I liked War of the World best for all the ‘spolosions. I give H.G. Wells’ The War of the Worlds five tentacles up.

Tripod

January 8, 2006

Yes, we’ve got problems - just ask Kurt Vonnegut!

Filed under: Reviews

I just finished A Man Without a Country by Vonnegut, a Christmas gift from someone who is finely tuned to dropped hints.


It’s a waif of a book at one hundred and fifty pages. Seriously, it could be read inside an hour, but I advise against this. Vonnegut’s sardonic wit should be read carefully to absorb its full effect. There are some laugh-out-loud passages here, twelve short essays the curmudgeon has written over the past few years.

He hits topics as various as what it was like to drive a Saab before they become yuppie mobiles, sure-fire jokes to tell at a funeral for a humanist, and his assessment of the intelligence of our national leaders. As for the latter, let’s just say he assesses the IQ of our commander-in-chief not much higher than his height (the president’s, not the author’s) expressed in inches, measured, of course, while in his bare feet.

Speaking of plunging into war, do you know why I think George W. Bush is so pissed off at Arabs? They brought us algebra. Also the numbers we use, including a symbol for nothing, which Europeans had never had before. You think Arabs are dumb? Try doing long division with Roman numerals.

Each essay is perfect for that ten minutes before bedtime. Kurt will tuck you in and sing you a lullaby. Problem is you’re liable to have nightmares. Vonnegut is a pessimist who has entered grumpy geezerdom. He claims to have in his company such thinkers and creators as Mark Twain, Albert Einstein and Hungarian obstetrician and medical saint Ignaz Semmelweis, men who in their latter years succumbed to a great pessimism regarding the human condition. These are men that Vonnegut believes gave up on humanity, and at his ripe age, he is announcing he’s going that way too. Is this really what Vonnegut is choosing for a swan song?

Yes, Vonnegut has seen humanity do some of its worst. In a shelter he rode out the bombing of Dresden during WW II. Just that experience (good companion reading is Slaughterhouse Five) might be reason enough to place your bet on another horse other than humanity.

He’s sorry for the shit that being handed down to future generations by his peers, and it’s honest sorrow folks. It’s hard to break through the bleakness to dig out true nuggets of brilliance here. What shines more is the way Vonnegut says it, not necessarily what he is saying, even though I find myself agreeing with just about everything. They are all laments we’ve read before: our addiction to fossil fuels, war millionaires metamorphisizing into beautiful little war billionaires with silky wings, the invalidity of recent elections, and so on.

Where Vonnegut hits the mark is when he cheers up, either in his celebration of the virtues of what he calls “freshwater middle America”, the heart of the country that brought us Abe Lincoln, poet Carl Sandburg and socialist Eugene V. Debbs, or his description of visiting the postal convenience center near the UN building in New York to send a manuscript to his typist. Yeah, can you believe it, actually mailing something?

I’m secretly in love with the woman behind the counter. She doesn’t know it. My wife knows it. I am not about to do anything about it. She is so nice. All I have ever seen of her is from the waist up because she is always behind the counter. But every day she will do something with herself above her waist to cheer us up . . . This is all so exciting and so generous of her, just to cheer us up, people from all over the world.

Here, Vonnegut seems to pop out of the prose. Ironically, this is taken from an essay called We are here to fart around. Don’t let anybody tell you any different. It is when he is farting around that he is most accessible. Be warned by the pessimist in him, but love the old fart for cheering some of us up.